Project no.2
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS REPORT
PROJECT AIM: THIS PROJECT REQUIRES STUDENTS TO WORK IN A GROUP OF 8 TO CONDUCT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF 2 CASE STUDIES BETWEEN LOCAL HERITAGE BUILDINGS (MODERN MALAYSIA ARCHITECTURE ). THE 2 CASE STUDIES GIVEN TO OUR GROUP ARE GENERAL HOSPITAL KUALA LUMPUR AND SULTAN ABDUL AMAD BUILDING. THIS RPOJECTS ALLOWS STUDENTS TO BE FAMILIARIZED WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF CULMINATION AND PRODUCTION OF A RESEARCH ANALYSIS THROUGH ASSEMBLAGE, CHRONOLOGICAL ARRANGEMENTS, DIAGRAMMING EXERCISES, INDICES AND EVALUATION OF INFORMATION; COMPOSING AND ORGANIZATION OF STUDY; ASSEMBLY OF ILLUSTRATION AND TEXT; DESIGN LAYOUT; POSTER AND GENERAL PRESENTATION.
DURATION : 7 WEEKS
SUBMISSION : A A4 ANALYSIS BOOKLET WITH UPLOADED DATA AND VIDUAL OF CHOSEN TOPIC ; APA REFERRING AND SOURCING
FINAL OUTCOME
" REFLECTION ------------
-HAVING LEAD BY THE GROUP LEADER, WE ARE ASSIGNED DIFFERENT ROLES AND INCORPORATE AND WORK TOGETHER TO THE FINAL OUTCOME OF THE PROJECT.I AWLEDKNOWLEDGE THE IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP /TEAMWORK AS I BELIEVE A GOOD LEADER CAN LEAD THE SUCCESS.
- BY THE END OF THE PROJECT,I REALISED I HAVE UNDERSTOOD AND GAINED LOTS MORE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE MALAYSIAN HISTORY AND HOW IS IT TIES TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MALAYSIA ARCHITECTURE.
- MY TEAM AND DID SOME EDITING FOR THE PHOTO AND GRAPHIC GOT FROM THE INTERNET TO HIGHTLINGTHS THE PARTS THAT WE WANTED TO FOCUS ON WITH RESULT IN A GOOD OUTCOME FOR OUR BOOKLET
- MY TEAM AND WERE ABLE TO FIND SUITABLE GRAPHICS TO SUPPORT OUR ELABORATIONS WHEN WE HAVE ENCOUNTERED PROBLEMS. WE SOLVED PROBLEMS CRITICALLY BY DRAWING OUT THE VISUALS OF OURSELVES FOR ANNOTATION/ FURTHER CLARIFICATION.